Monday, December 27, 2010

വനത്തില്‍ പോലും ക്വാറി , നിയമങ്ങള്‍ കാറ്റില്‍ പറത്തി സര്‍ക്കാര്‍ ഉത്തരവ് !!


സംസ്ഥാനത്തെ ക്വാറികള്‍ക്ക് ഇനി ഏകജാലക അംഗീകാരം. വനം വകുപ്പിന്റെ സമ്മതമില്ലാതെ വനത്തില്‍ പോലും ക്വാറികള്‍ തുടങ്ങാന്‍  റവന്യൂ - വ്യവസായ വകുപ്പുകള്‍ സംയുക്തമായി പുറത്തിറക്കിയ സര്‍ക്കാര്‍ ഉത്തരവിന്റെ പിന്‍ബലം.
കേരളത്തിന്റെ പരിസ്ഥിതിക്ക് മേല്‍ അടിക്കുന്ന അവസാനത്തെ ആണിയാവും ഈ നിയമവിരുദ്ധ ഉത്തരവ്.
വന മേഖലകളില്‍ വനേതര പ്രവര്‍ത്തനങ്ങള്‍ അനുവദിക്കാന്‍ കേന്ദ്ര വനം മന്ത്രാലയത്തിന്റെ മുന്‍‌കൂര്‍ അനുമതി നേടണമെന്ന നിയമം നിലനില്‍ക്കെയാണ് അത് ലംഖിച്ചുകൊണ്ട് സര്‍ക്കാര്‍ ഉത്തരവ് ഇറങ്ങിയിരിക്കുന്നത്. ഈ വിവാദ ഉത്തരവിന് പിന്നിലും വ്യവസായ സെക്രട്ടറി ടി.ബാലകൃഷ്ണന്റെ കൈകള്‍ ആയിരിക്കാം. നിയമം ലംഖിച്ചു ഉത്തരവിറക്കിയതിനു കേന്ദ്ര വനം നിയമപ്രകാരം ഈ ഉദ്യോഗസ്ഥന്മാര്‍ ശിക്ഷ അര്‍ഹിക്കുന്നു. ബാക്കി അങ്കം ഹൈക്കോടതിയില്‍ കാണാം.

Monday, December 20, 2010

Fish Introduction Impacts

PROPOSAL TO STOCK EXOTIC FISH IN RESERVOIRS OF RESERVE FORESTS CONRCERN CONSERVATIONISTS

The proposal by the Fisheries Department to stock fish seeds in reservoirs, especially those in reserve forests, has been objected severely by the conservationists. The proposal seeks stocking Indian Major Carps (IMCs) in the 16 reservoirs of Kerala, including Kallada, Kakki, Pamba, Anayirangal, Neriyamangalam, Ponmudi, Kandala, Shenkulam, Mattupetti, Bhootathankettu, Peringalkuthu, Sholayar, Parambikkulam, Karapuzha, Banasurasagar and Pazhasii, located within the reserve forest areas.

The conservationists oppose the move primarily because of the fact that the Western Ghat rivers are the aquatic biodiversity hotspots. Any introduction of IMCs, which are highly competitive and voracious feeders would lead to the extermination of the highly threatened indigenous fish fauna, notwithstanding their impacts on other aquatic organisms, which remain less documented. 

The introduced fishes would be aggressive, prolific breeders which would move out of the reservoirs and expand their range along the river courses, both upstream as well as downstream. They would easily push out of their niches the indigenous species and prey upon the local species of fishes, their fingerlings or spawn. They would voraciously feed on the aquatic biomass and successfully compete with all the indigenous species of freshwater fauna. Dr. Sathis Chandran, a  noted ecologist, says that most of our reservoirs are in the Western Ghats and the catchment areas upstream of the reservoirs are Reserved Forests. At least twenty large reservoirs in the State are within National Parks and Sanctuaries where the primary objective of management of the area is wildlife protection. Introducing exotic species is obviously violation of the Wildlife Protection Act. Another seven reservoirs are inside wet evergreen forests with very high biodiversity potential where the species richness remains inadequately documented. Therefore this move has to be abandoned.

A recent study conducted by Mr Robin Kurian Abraham in the southern Western Ghats shows that the protected areas act as the refugee for highly endemic fish fauna and one of the greatest threats is the presence of exotic species. For example, in Kulathupuzha river the Common carp introduced for aquaculture has escaped downstream and is in the process of replacing the threatened mahseer fish. This is an indication of possible replacement of indigenous fish by the larger and highly competitive carps.  Exotic fishes such as Tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus), Common carp (Cyprinus carpio), African catfish (Clarias gariepienus), and IMCs have gained entry into the reservoir ecosystems of India through accidental or deliberate introduction. Among them tilapia has already entered into all the upstream rivers of Kerala, including forest streams and established viable populations (Dr. Bijukumar, Dept. of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, University of Kerala).

Convention on Biological Diversity states: "Inland water ecosystems are particularly vulnerable to invasive alien species. There is limited success in the prevention, eradication and control of invasive alien species in inland water ecosystems with fewer methods available than for the control of invasive species in terrestrial systems, particularly for organisms, which are submerged (such as fish)". The rivers of the Western Ghats are freshwater biodiversity hotspots, as each stream may serve as an evolutionary centre as far as highly endemic freshwater fish fauna are concerned. The water bodies associated with the Western Ghats harbours 288 species of freshwater fish of which 118 are endemic. A larger diversity of new freshwater fishes has been recorded from the aquatic ecosystems associated with the Kerala part of the Western Ghats. For example, a relatively small watershed of Chalakkudy river, covering less than 1700sq km has more than 100 species of fishes, many of which are endemic to the river! Moreover, the upper reaches of most of the river basins in Kerala are within forests and have not been exhaustively surveyed for their biota. 

In the Government's 'Guidelines for Culture-based Fisheries Management in Small Reservoirs in India', under Box. 3, it is stated "In India, fish transferred on the trans-basin basis within the geographic boundaries of the country is not considered as exotic, with no restrictions on such transfers. Thus, Indian major carps such as Catla is not regarded as exotic in peninsular rivers, despite the fact that the species is outside its normal range of distribution and peninsular rivers have habitats, distinctly different from the Ganges and Brahmaputra river systems. The small west-flowing drainages of the Western Ghats…. have ichthyofauna different from the Ganga and Brahmaputra river systems. Catla, Rohu and Mrigal have been stocked in the peninsular reservoirs for many decades now, varying results. In some of the reservoirs in Southern India, they have established breeding populations. The country's policy on stocking reservoirs,though not very explicit, disallows the introduction of exotic species into reservoirs." There is a clear affirmation in the above passage that west flowing drainages of the Western Ghats are substantially different from the perennial, glacier-fed, floodplain rivers of the Ganga-Brahmaputra river systems, which is the original habitat for the Major Carps. So, when such large bodied floodplain species are regularly introduced in large numbers, to the seasonal river systems of the Western Ghats, which harbour a rich diversity of significantly different, but remarkably unique fish species adapted to the seasonal streams, there is bound to be a marked negative impact on many of the smaller endemic fishes and on other important aquatic organisms like tadpoles of numerous species of endemic frogs, molluscs, crabs, freshwater prawns, larvae of macro-invertebrates and aquatic vegetation, says Robin Kurian Abraham.

 

Majority of the endemic fishes in Kerala find their home in the pristine streams and rivers within the reserve forests of Kerala. The recent recording of Piranha from Chalakkudy river, African catfishes from many water bodies including Periyar lake and Nile tilapia from Bhrathapuzha river is a matter of concern to the freshwater aquatic diversity, taking into account the greater endemism of fish fauna in these systems. The present case of introduction of Indian Major Carps (IMCs) should also be discussed in a holistic ecosystem perspective, as there are reports that introduction of fish to different habitats within the country may also lead to loss of biodiversity. Though there are such reports in Asia, such studies, unfortunately, have not initiated in India and this demand for a precautionary approach. (Dr. Bijukumar, Dept. of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, University of Kerala).

 

.

 

There are at least 61 species of threatened fishes (listed as either critically endangered or endangered) that occur in the rivers of Kerala. Although explicit information regarding the factors that drive native fish species towards endangerment is still unclear, there is a general consensus that habitat loss and exotic species could be the possible reasons. There is bound to be competition by the introduced major carps with indigenous fish species, since they are introduced in huge numbers. For instance, the Mrigal, which is a bottom feeder, would compete with local bottom feeding species like members of the genus Hypselobarbus, which have several endemic species in the Western Ghats. Column feeders such as Puntius spp. would be in direct competition with introduced Rohu, who use the same mid-column niche.

According to recent researches, one of the major threats for native freshwater fishes, after habitat destruction, is the introduction of non-native species.

Majority of the endemic freshwater fish in Kerala are restricted in their distribution to the Western Ghats rivers, especially in the reserve forest areas. Moreover, it is also important to note that all the fishes reported new to science from Kerala in the recent past have their restricted distribution in the forest streams. Based on his recently concluded a scientific study Mr Robin Kurian Abraham sys that streams, rivers and reservoirs inside Protected Areas managed by the Forest Department are critical habitats for many indigenous freshwater fish species. These species, many of which are endemic to the Western Ghats, are severely under pressure outside Protected Areas, from threats like sand mining, dynamite fishing, overharvesting and the release of untreated domestic, medical and chemical wastes into rivers. So substantial populations of many native and rare species seek refuge inside Wildlife Sanctuaries and Reserved Forests, whereas their population is drastically low, outside of the sanctuaries and reserved forests.

 

The IMCs are represented by three species: Catla (Catla catla), Rohu (Labeo rohita) and the mrigal (Cirrhinus cirrhosus; earlier Cirrhinus mrigala). Catla catla grows to a maximum length of 182 cm and a weight of over 38 kg and is a surface and mid-water feeders, feeding mainly omnivorous with juveniles feeding on aquatic and terrestrial insects, detritus and phytoplankton. The column feeder Labeo rohita attains a maximum length of 200 cm and weight of 45 kg, and prefers plants as their food. The mrigal Cirrhinus cirrhosus grows to 100 cm in size and 13 kg in weight and is a bottom feeder. It is important to note that majority of indigenous fish in the Western Ghats never attain this length, and feeds as voraciously as IMCs. Further, by exploiting all the available niche, they are strong competitors. Therefore, we also need to consider the fact the smaller rivers in Kerala are ecologically not suitable for the IMCs and in the long run, culturing them in the reservoirs of Kerala would not be economically feasible in the long run, as the current motive of stocking is ONLY to 'enhance' fish production.

The costs and benefits of invasive alien species are mixed because alien species are often a major source of income, food or livelihood for local communities and often support major economic activities (such as aquaculture production). The challenge, therefore, is how to maximize the benefits whilst minimising the risks. Greater attention needs to be given, where feasible, to promoting the use of native species. However, the use of native species should include precautions to conserve the genetic diversity of native populations. In this context conservation of indigenous biodiversity should be given priority.

 

Most of these introductions, including those within the country, have been made regardless of the consequences for the ecosystems, as the effect on ecological interactions between species, hybridization with native species, loss of biodiversity, and introduction of new pathogens and diseases among others. The replacement of non-native species with native species is an issue that must be considered, especially in countries with high freshwater fish biodiversity where it is easier to find suitable candidates. Considering the possible negative impacts of IMCs to the indigenous fish fauna, which shows greater endemism, the move to stock them in the reservoirs within the reserve forests need to be stopped as a precautionary principle.

Note by Dr.Satheesh Chandran

The Extremely Severe Threat the Freshwater Ecosystems of Kerala Face due to the Introduction of Exotic Species of Fishes in the Reservoirs

 

There is the often repeated assertion that the State of Kerala is blessed with an abundance of freshwater. An annual average rainfall of more than 3000mm, the north-south alignment of the Western Ghats with its crest rising up to an average elevation of 1800m above the mean sea level, the intense seasonal rainfall running off this steep hard rock mountain creating a large number of distinct river basins and the humid tropical vegetation cover have all created an extraordinary array of freshwater and brackish water ecosystems in the State of Kerala. The Western Ghats as a whole forms a refugia for a very large assemblage of biota. The complex topographical conditions each river basin is endowed with results in unique physico-chemical and biological characteristics not replicated even in the adjacent basins. Some sections of the Western Ghats have the distinction of harbouring the highest percentage of endemic species both in the plant as well as animal world. Simultaneously Western Ghats also has the dubious distinction of extensive and rapid habitat degradation. Hence it is considered a globally important hot spot as far as its biodiversity is concerned.

 

It is the quantum of available water and the characteristics of the hydrological cycle that makes the Western Ghats such an exceptional refugia of flora and fauna. Naturally moisture demanding plants, aquatic insects, fishes and amphibians constitute a large percentage of the RET (Rare, Endangered and Threatened) species recorded from this landscape unit. It is the human manipulations specifically adversely affecting the hydrological cycle that is posing the severest threat to this biodiversity. Deforestation and unsuitable landuse practices have already curtailed the perennial nature of the rivers. Excessive application of agro chemicals has drastically affected the chemical quality of the surface water discharge everywhere in the State. All the major rivers have been repeatedly dammed and some diverted to other basins. Downstream of all the dams for considerable lengths the river channels remain totally dry for practically round the year. The coastal brackish water systems have suffered drastic modifications including extensive reclamation, reduced freshwater inflow during the lean season and sea water ingress during summer apart from widespread urban sewage accumulation. In short practically all the rivers and backwaters in Kerala are imperilled.

 

The extraordinary diversity of freshwater fishes in Kerala is illustrated by the fact that a relatively small basin, Chalakkudy covering less than 1700sq km has more than 100 species of fishes recorded from it so far. The upper reaches of most of these basins are within forests and have not been exhaustively surveyed for their biota. This year the world has been celebrating as the Year of Biodiversity to highlight the significance of all other species sharing Planet Earth along with us. The celebration is also to draw attention to the fact that the intricate web of life supporting human existence also is suffering irreparable damage by our species.

 

Yet it is ironical that in this State of Kerala claiming high literacy standards and environmental consciousness we are simultaneously doing the most irresponsible of activities endangering our rich biodiversity and fragile ecosystems. The ongoing official programme of introducing exotic fishes in all the reservoirs in the State is a classical example of human folly. Already our natural habitats are extensively threatened by exotic species of plants and animals, some intentionally introduced and many accidental invasives. Weed species such as mikania, aggressive plant feeders such as the Giant African Snail, African fishes such as catfish are taking over habitats and drastically undermining them.

 

The present move to introduce exotic fishes into the reservoirs should be halted immediately.  This move is supposed to be for enhancing the availability of freshwater fishes. But excepting a few, most of our reservoirs practically dry up in summer, especially during the years when there is a failure of the retreat monsoon. The introduced fishes would be aggressive, prolific breeders which would move out of the reservoirs and expand their range along the river courses, both upstream as well as downstream. They would easily push out of their niches the indigenous species and prey upon the local species of fishes, their fingerlings or spawn. They would voraciously feed on the aquatic biomass and successfully compete with all the indigenous species of freshwater fauna. Most of our reservoirs are in the Western Ghats and the catchment areas upstream of the reservoirs are Reserved Forests. At least twenty large reservoirs in the State are within National Parks and Sanctuaries where the primary objective of management of the area is wildlife protection. Introducing exotic species is obviously violation of the Wildlife Protection Act. Another seven reservoirs are inside wet evergreen forests with very high biodiversity potential where the species richness remains inadequately documented.

 

The very economic viability as well as sustainability of this dubious venture should be questioned. In spite of the long history of introducing fish fry into reservoirs such as Neyyar, Malampuzha etc the actual returns need to be assessed objectively. With very inadequate data base on the primary as well as secondary productivity in our man-made reservoirs, the carrying capacity of these unstable water bodies to support large fish populations is to be questioned.

 

 

8 December 2010                                                  S. Sathis Chandran

Letter to Wild Life Warden

DEPARTMENT OF AQUATIC BIOLOGY & FISHERIES

UNIVERSITY OF KERALA

Kariavattom, Thiruvananthapuram – 695581, Kerala

Ph: 0471 2167679; 094472 16157 (mob); E mail: bijupuzhayoram@gmail.com

 

08 December 2010

Dr. A. Biju Kumar

Assistant Professor

 

To

 

The Chief Wildlife Warden,

Kerala Forests & Wildlife Department,

Forest Headquarters,

Vazhuthacaud,

Thiruvananthapuram

cww@forest.kerala.gov.in

 

Sir:

The proposal by the Fisheries Department to stock fish seeds in reservoirs as per the project sanctioned to them by the Government of India, would hamper the indigenous biodiversity in various manners. A note on the impacts of introduction of exotic species in water bodies is attached below for your kind perusal.

  1. Invasive species are considered to be a significant threat to biodiversity, often categorised next to habitat destruction, especially in freshwater systems. Non-native, invasive fish have contributed to the extirpation of indigenous species. There are already well established documents on the ecosystem level and species level catastrophic impacts of exotic species introductions, which we also have to take into account very seriously.

 

  1. The present case of introduction of Indian Major Carps (IMCs) should also be discussed in a holistic ecosystem perspective, as there are reports that introduction of fish to different habitats within the country may also lead to loss of biodiversity. Though there are such reports in Asia (Kottelat and Whitten, 1998), such studies, unfortunately, have not initiated in India. This demand for a precautionary approach.
  2. The rivers of the Western Ghats are freshwater biodiversity hotspots, as each stream may serve as an evolutionary centre as far as highly endemic freshwater fish fauna are concerned. The water bodies associated with the Western Ghats harbours 288 species of freshwater fish of which 118 are endemic. A larger diversity of new freshwater fishes has been recorded from the aquatic ecosystems associated with the Kerala part of the Western Ghats. For example, a relatively small watershed of Chalakkudy river, covering less than 1700sq km has more than 100 species of fishes, many of which are endemic to the river! Moreover, the upper reaches of most of the river basins in Kerala are within forests and have not been exhaustively surveyed for their biota. 
  3. Majority of the endemic fishes in Kerala find their home in the pristine streams and rivers within the reserve forests of Kerala. The recent recording of Piranha from Chalakkudy river, African catfishes from many water bodies including Periyar lake and Nile tilapia from Bhrathapuzha river is a matter of concern to the freshwater aquatic diversity, taking into account the greater endemism of fish fauna in these systems. Yet we are trying exotic fishes continuously. With the ongoing aquaculture and aquarium trade initiatives, many more may find their way to the aquatic ecosystems.
  4. The flying barb (Esomus thermoicos), Crossocheilus periyarensis, Gonoproktopterus micropogon periyarensis, Labeo dussumieri, Lepidopygopsis typus, Neolissochilus wynaadensis, Osteobrama bakeri, Osteochilus (= Kantaka) brevidorsalis, O. longidorsalis, Puntius arulius arulius, Puntius exclamatio, Puntius pookodensis, P. puckelli, P. denisonii, P. chalakkudiensis, P. ophicephalus, Garra hughi, G. menoni, G. surendranathani, G. periyarensis, Homaloptera menoni, H. pillaii, Travancoria jonesi, T. elongate, Mesonemaheilus  menoni, M. remadevii, Nemacheilus deninsoni pambaensis, N. sinuatus, Oreonectes keralensis, Pangio bashai, Batasio travancoria, Horabagrus nigricollaris, Mystus armatus, Pseudeutropius mitchelli, Glyptothorax anamalaiensis, G. housei, Clarias dayi, Horaglanis krishnai, H. alikunhi, Microphis brachyurus, Monopterus (Amphipnous) fossorius, M. (Monopterus) eapeni, M. digressus, M. roseni, Parambassis dayi, Pristolepis marginata, Pristolepis malabaricus, Channa diplogramma, C. leucopunctatus, Macrognathus guentheri, Carinotetraodon imitator are some of the species endemic to Kerala part of the western ghats, and majority of them are restricted in their distribution to the Western Ghats rivers. Moreover, it is also important to note that all the fishes reported new to science from Kerala in the recent past have their restricted distribution in the western ghat rivers. In this context, introduction of more competitive and fast growing IMCs to the reservoirs would lead to their migration both upstream and downstream, hampering the habitats and the very existence of indigenous species. The record of IMCs from the river systems of Kerala are all escapes from the reservoirs.

 

  1. One of the possible impacts of IMCs in our rivers, especially in the upstream reservoirs, may be habitat alteration and replacement of indigenous species through competition for food and space. The IMCs are represented by three species: Catla (Catla catla), Rohu (Labeo rohita) and the mrigal (Cirrhinus cirrhosus; earlier Cirrhinus mrigala). Catla catla grows to a maximum length of 182 cm and a weight of over 38 kg and is a surface and mid-water feeders, feeding mainly omnivorous with juveniles feeding on aquatic and terrestrial insects, detritus and phytoplankton. The column feeder Labeo rohita attains a maximum length of 200 cm and weight of 45 kg, and prefers plants as their food. The mrigal Cirrhinus cirrhosus grows to 100 cm in size and 13 kg in weight and is a bottom feeder. It is important to note that majority of indigenous fish in the Western Ghats never attain this length, and feeds as voraciously as IMCs. Further, by exploiting all the available niche, they are strong competitors.

 

  1. Therefore, we also need to consider the fact the smaller rivers in Kerala are ecologically not suitable for the IMCs and in the long run, culturing them in the reservoirs of Kerala would not be economically feasible in the long run, as the current motive of stocking is ONLY to 'enhance' fish production.
  2. Exotic fishes such as Tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus), Common carp (Cyprinus carpio), African catfish (Clarias gariepienus),  and IMCs have gained entry into the reservoir ecosystems of India through accidental or deliberate introduction. Among them tilapia has already entered into all the upstream rivers of Kerala, including forest streams and established viable populations. A recent study by Mr Robin Kurian Abraham shows that in Kulathupuzha river Common carp is in the process of replacing the threatened mahseer fish and is now occupying majority of the niches. This is an indication of possible replacement of indigenous fish by the larger and highly competitive carps. 
  3. Convention on Biological Diversity states: "Inland water ecosystems are particularly vulnerable to invasive alien species. There is limited success in the prevention, eradication and control of invasive alien species in inland water ecosystems with fewer methods available than for the control of invasive species in terrestrial systems, particularly for organisms, which are submerged (such as fish)".
  4. The costs and benefits of invasive alien species are mixed because alien species are often a major source of income, food or livelihood for local communities and often support major economic activities (such as aquaculture production).  But at the same time, invasive alien species may degrade the natural resources upon which economies and local communities depend. These mixed benefits and risks are difficult to predict or manage which results in potential conflicts regarding the use of invasive alien species. The challenge, therefore, is how to maximize the benefits whilst minimising the risks. All too often, alien species are used as an easy option for agriculture and fisheries related activities.  Greater attention needs to be given, where feasible, to promoting the use of native species. However, the use of native species should include precautions to conserve the genetic diversity of native populations. In this context conservation of indigenous biodiversity should be given priority.
  5. In this context, economic viability of the project of introduction of IMCs in the reservoirs inside reserve forests also needs to be assessed. As opined by Dr. Sathis Chandran, "we have little data on the primary as well as secondary productivity in our reservoirs and the carrying capacity of these unstable water bodies to support large fish populations is to be questioned". For example, the tilapia, O. mossambicus was first introduced into the pond ecosystem of the country in 1952 and soon it was stocked in the reservoirs of south India. By the end of 1960s, most of the reservoirs in Tamil Nadu and those in the Palakkad and Thrissur districts of Kerala were regularly stocked with tilapia. Performance of tilapia in ponds of south India has been discouraging mainly due to its early maturity, continuous breeding, over-population and dwarfing and this may be expected in reservoirs also. The unfortunate situation is that we don't have strong data base even now on the ecology and food web dynamics of many of the threatened indigenous fishes, and the attention of researches should be focussed on this.
  6. Considering the possible negative impacts of IMCs to the indigenous fish fauna, which shows greater endemism, the move to stock them in the reservoirs within the reserve forests need to be stopped as a precautionary principle.

Thiruvananthapuram                                                                          

08 December 2010                                                                              BIJUKUMAR